Is Justified True Belief Knowledge Essay

Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? (The Gettier Problem) Background Epistemology A theory of _____________ What do we mean when we claim to know something? What kinds of restricts must be satisfied in order for a claim to become knowledge? Note we are concerned in __________________ knowledge here (S knows that p), not knowledge of how to do things (e. g. , knowing how to ride a bike) The tripartite theory of knowledge knowledge as justify true belief (JTB) The truth narrow We cant know something that is false. We may think that we know, but it would simply be a mistake.The belief condition If we claim to know that p, we must believe that p. We cannot know something and yet do not believe in it. (Even though we can still believe in a claim that we dont know about) In other words, believing is a _____________ condition for knowing, while knowing is a ______________ condition for believing. The Justification condition Simply holding a true belief is not enough we must also be able to give financial support to our belief. Example of a true belief that we dont consider knowledge But why is a ___________ true belief more priceless than a __________ true belief?Traditionally, philosophers have been pretty satisfied with the tripartite theory of knowledge. The three conditions set out above are individually necessary, and jointly sufficient, for knowledge claims. Now, this tripartite theory of knowledge is precisely the target of Edmund Gettiers 1963 paper Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Recall the pragmatic usage of an argument to persuade your audience of a proposition that they dont already believe. Gettiers argument serves this purpose by challenging a commonly accepted notion of knowledge (knowledge as JTB).First, Gettier lays out two assumptions of his argument Justification is ____________________One can be justified in believing something that is in incident ___________________. One is justified in believing a proposition that one has been vali dly deduced from another statement, i. e. , if one is justified in believing P, and if P entails Q, past one is justified in believing Q. Method of _____________ examples Gettier has produced two examples that 1) satisfy the tripartite conditions of knowledge yet 2) we are not inclined to consider them knowledge. sheath 1 The man who will get the job has 10 coins in his pocket Case 2 Either Jones owns a Ford, or Brown is in Barcelona In both examples, the knowers have a justified true belief, but __________ plays an important role in both examples Constructing a Gettier case Case 3 You see your professor passed out at the Corner bar. So, you believe in the following proposition P Prof. S was drinking at the Corner Pub tonight.Suppose you are justified in believing in proposition P your professor told you that she was going to the Corner Pub you know that your professor is a lightweight the person you saw passed out has a stack of quizzes on the chair next to her. Now, it is in fac t true that Prof. S was drinking at the Corner Pub tonight. However, the person you saw was actually her identical twin infant. She came to visit your professor, and the two of them went to the Corner Pub for drinks. You saw your profs sister passed out while your prof was getting a taxi outside. 1 / 2 So, even though you have a justified true belief, do you have knowledge? Two possible solutions to the Gettier problemStrengthen justification a claim that is truly justified cannot be false (denying Gettiers startle assumption) Find the fourth condition Knowledge is justified true belief + something else POWERED BY TCPDF (WWW. TCPDF. ORG).