Explain the concepts of both individual and cultural relativism Essay

Explain the concepts of both individual and cultural relativism - Essay ExampleOf wideness to note is that, at times this concept counters itself and its subsequent argument of what might be perceived as righteousness of wrong could be concluded as baseless (Brooks, 2011).This respectable relativism concept articulates that the perception of what is goodly right is dependent on a given socialization. For instance, one coating might believe in cannibalism as being morally right while another culture is against the practice. Needless to say, this concept assists in understanding why certain practices are common in some cultures and not others (Brooks, 2011).Apparently, the concept Utilitarianism argues that follow out could be defined as morally right or wrong when the consequences are at pass away unlike ethical relativism where right or wrong is determined by an individual or culture (Brooks, 2011).Kantian theory is described as one of the best ethical principles as it articu lates that humans beings beget the opportunity to effectively use their reasoning faculty to determine what their obligated to do and do it diligently. Conversely, ethical relativism does not entail actual reasoning on a particular action but transparent perception (Brooks, 2011).This contract theory revolves around an agreement that is formed by two differently nonionic groups of people where responsibilities are assigned to each member of the group. Moreover, limitations and rights about certain issues are defined. In ethical relativism, cultural relativism where society is incorporated does not have limitations and rights, but practices that are perceived morally right or wrong (Brooks, 2011).Actually, divine command theory argues that actions deemed to be moral rightly ought to be identical to what God has commanded and that being moral is following what God has commanded unlike Ethical Relativism where an individual or culture decides what is right or wrong (Brooks, 2011). This theory articulates that natural laws that are created as a result of human reasoning could