Compare the representations of Frankenstein Essay Example for Free

Compare the representations of Frankenstein EssayCompare the representations of Frankenstein in Branaghs Mary Shelleys Frankenstein and the 1931 withdraw Frankenstein directed by James Whale Language- 1931 Camera Close ups are non used on Frankenstein as Branagh wants roundabout to wonder what he looks like. in that location are lots of pans to show the set and the people on that point. There is a close up on the monsters hand when it is twitching. There arent many edits which makes it boring and not very interesting. Sound Diegetic sound is the machines, Frankenstein shouting, noise of the monster being taken up. Non-diegetic sound is the thunder there is no music at all in the extract. Mise-en-scene Henry Frankenstein is wearing a lab application/straight jacket, which gives the impression that he is crazy. He has slicked back hair using hair oil. The performing panache is very over the top, like theatrical playacting. Frankenstein is side lit, to make him look sh ake up and horrified. general the lighting is mostly by top lights and sometimes the lightening. 1994 Camera There are lots of excited zooms, pans and also up and down shots, which makes the audience intimidated.The camera follows Frankenstein and shows his emotions/feelings. The edits are very fast and unnoticeable, using cuts and get cuts. By making the editing quicker, this builds up the tension. Sound Diegetic sound are the chains, machines moving, bangs, slots into the body, the electricity sparks and also Frankensteins function and movements. Non diegetic sound is the dramatic theme music, building up to create much more tension. Mise-en-scene Victor Frankenstein is change in trousers but with no top. However the monster is naked.Frankensteins hair is shoulder length, which is very messy and sweaty. The acting style is exciting and energetic but not mad. Frankenstein is chiefly lit on his upper body. There are lots of side lights and candle light, however the room loo ks dark. Institutions 1931 In black and white. Universal studios do the film, as they k naked as a jaybird detestation would be a big money spinner. It was voted one of the best films of the year by New York Times. 1994 It wasnt as brand new as it was in 1931, as in 1994 many horror films had been out.The technology was much more advanced and a lot had changed from 1931, new ideas and there was a new effect on people. Audience 1931 The big actor, Boris Karloff was used to attract the audiences. People in 1931 were different to 1994, as it was all fresh and new to them. Cinema was a get away for people. Frankenstein was a big horror, and scared the audiences of its day. The monster, which was thought as Frankenstein became a big horror icon, with a built up brow and a bolt through his neck. 1994Kenneth Branagh and Robert de Niro were used to attract audiences. Horror films were the norm to people in 1994. They were a lot more sophisticated. Money was much more wide-spread in 1994 but wasnt as much in 1931. deputation 1931 Frankenstein was dressed very much like a man in 1931. His movements, delivery of the lines and his acting style is all over the top, like in the way of a theatre play. The light is normally ground on the monster and when its on Frankenstein, the light would be on his upper body.The 1931 film changes Frankensteins name to Henry, sort of than Victor The audience are supposed to react to Frankenstein in a scary way and that he comes across very mad. 1994 Frankenstein dresses and looks very much like a man of the time that the novel was written. His movements and acting style is energetic and exciting however doesnt come across at all mad. The light is mainly based on Frankensteins upper body the rest of the room is very dark. The music interprets Frankenstein very well, as he is running around being busy.The music is a fast, dramatic orchestra. Frankensteins name stays the equivalent as the novel, which is Victor. The audience are suppo sed to think that Frankenstein is very involved with his work and wants to get it through with(p) to see the result.