Comparison of Dracula and Bram Stokers Dracula Essay -- Comparison Co

Comp ar/ course Dracula and Bram Stokers Dracula A noticeable difference in the commission movies have changed over the years is evident when comparing and contrasting both films of different eras which belong to the same genre and contain the same battleground matter. Two lamia movies, Dracula and Bram Stokers Dracula, present an interesting example of this type fixateters case of study. Comparing the 1931 version of Dracula, starring Bela Lugosi, with Frances Ford Coppolas Bram Stokers Dracula 1993 version yields more or less similarities. Both films be of the same genre Horror. Both films argon set around the same quantify period. Also, both deal with a vampire coming to England and causing disruptions in peoples lives. Beyond these few similarities are many contrasts. An obvious difference in these films is that the 1931 version played to a slack audience and that the Coppola version played to a modern audience. (I am universe extremely careful because, obviously, the 1931 audience was modern in 1931 however, we like to mobilize of ourselves as being more modern than past generations. There are differences in the audiences which viewed the respective versions in their time, and I hope to prove this distributor point as the paper unfolds.) When we compare the portrayal of characters in the areas of gender, race, and age, we find strike contrasts. In the 1931 version, work forces roles are well-defined they are the protectors. For example, Jonathan hovers over mynah in many scenes, giving us the impression that Mina is a helpless creature. In Coppolas version, Jonathan is by no means a protector. He barely escapes Draculas castle Mina has to go to him--to protect him. Also interesting, are the differences in the portrayal of the women in these film... ... audience handle this, or is it because they posit realism? Possibly, this demand for realistic interpretation of subject matter is a major cause of the differences between these films howeve r, as was shown in this paper, there are also other reasons for the variations. 1931 was a time of poverty for many Americans who essential escape into a film where traditional values were upheld where God wins where men and womens roles are well-defined and where order reigns. Coppolas version has been released in a time where the patriarchal system has begun to break down where prejudice is no time-consuming acceptable (still practiced, but not acceptable) and where we require everything to be extreme. BibliographyBram Stokers Dracula. Dir. Frances Ford Coppola. capital of South Carolina TriStar Home Video, 1993. Dracula. Dir. Tod Browning. Universal Pictures Corporation, 1931.