Transcendentalism And A Belief In A higher Power :: essays research papers

Transcendentalism and A Belief In A "Higher Power"     We do non have good reasons to believe in something transcendental. Mostof the arguments in raise of God, or a so-called "higher power" are base onfaith and emotion, and not a clear logical argument. In fact, these argumentsare often in favor of throwing logic out the window. In many ways, this questionis similar to mortal attempting to try the tender-hearted race of an inconspicuous elephant.It is far easier to prove that the elephant does not exist than it is to provethat it does.     Socrates principle of inquiry states that we must carefully examineall things. The tools we human use to do this are logic and the scientificmethod. In order to believe in something transcendental, you cannot examine yourbeliefs using logic and science. If you do, there is no way to prove theexistence of a higher power.     The primary argument against the exist ence of a Judeo-Christian all-knowing, all-powerful, righteous God is the argument from diabolic. This argumentargues against the presence of a higher power using facts of ordinary life. Thisargument states that most would view as that some of the pain and suffering (evil)in this world is inessential. To be considered a necessary evil, the occurrencemust be the only way to ca-ca something good, which outweighs the evil. Manyevents, such as infant deaths, would not be categorise in this category.     If such an all-knowing deity existed, it states, He would know thatthis evil was occurring. If He was all-powerful, He would have the power to stopthis evil. If He was righteous, He would stop the evil from occurringTherefore, the existence of evil cannot be compatible with the existence of thistype of God.     The primary response to the argument from evil is the appeal to humanfreedom. This argument states that God sees evil as necessary so that we humansmay be free to choose our own path. The fatal deface in this argument is thatthere are evils that exist not as a direct result of human choice. Natural evilssuch as floods, earthquakes, and tornadoes serve no purpose according to thisdefinition, and are therefore unnecessary evils.     A theist might respond to this with another weak rebuttal, stating that either evil produces compassion and understanding in others, and creates good inthat regard. This is an also positive, almost delusional view of evil. Almosteveryone will be able-bodied to come up with at least one example of someone who hassuffered an evil that has not directly or indirectly led to anything good.