Genetic Engineering is Unethical Essay -- Genetic Engineering is Immora

Just as the success of a corporate body in making money need not set the human agree ahead, neither does every scientific advance automatically make our lives much meaningful (Wald 45). These words were spoken by a Nobel Prize winning life scientist and Harvard professor, George Wald, in a lecture given in 1976 on the Dangers of familial Engineering. This quotation states that incredible inventions, such as genetic engineer, are not always beneficial to society. inherited applied science is altering the genetic significant of cells and/or organisms in order to make them capable of making virgin substances or performing new functions (Wald 45). It is also one of the top contentious issues of the 20th century (Epstein 1). Many believe that continuing to provide genetically constructed inventions in this world is ethical, which means that these inventions conform to ones clean-living standards (Epstein 5). Others argue that such inventions as human clones, which are genetical ly constructed humans, and early(a) genetically puddled figures, are wrong and should be stopped (Epstein 5). Overwhelming textual evidence proves that genetic engineering is not beneficial to society. Accordingly, genetic engineering is unethical and therefore should be stopped.One reason why genetic engineering should cease is be character genetic engineering disrupts societys deterrent example values and causes society to act out in destructive ways. An online behold done by Time Magazine in 1997, found that 11% of those who were interviewed believe that if clones are created in the future, the genetically created humans will completely be good for target practice (Epstein 2). Another survey by the analogous magazine was conducted and found that 50% of those who were questioned believe that clones should be treated as lower beings and should not be given the same rights as timeless humans (Epstein 2). Furthermore, a similar survey, completed by MacLeans Magazine in 1993, r eported that 11% of those interviewed confirmed that if technology was able to change defects inwardly their unborn child, they would not hesitate in changing the childs genes in order for the child to be born normal (Epstein 3). The choice to create ones own child will have many another(prenominal) believe that the better the genes, the better the child. These statistics, without a doubt, reveal that genetic engineering will be harmful to society if certain means... ...g (Bereano 18). One would signify that people would have control over their own genes however, that does not attend to be the case. Therefore, the rights to ones own identity will be abolished if human genes can be selected thus, genetic engineering should be stopped, for it is unethical.Genetic engineering should be eradicated due to the fact that it is immoral. It is proven that such inventions as genetic engineering can negatively affect society and cause rash and inappropriate behavior. Also, genetic enginee ring involves altering natures balance, which is not the job of scientists, or society. Finally, genetic engineering can abrogate ones sense of individuality and spoil Gods plan of making all people unique. Because of these reasons, genetic engineering should be stopped. It is a bad science making a dangerous adhesiveness with a bad business. Works CitedBereano, Phillip L. Body and Soul the Price of Biotech. Seattle Times. 20 Aug. 2005 18-20.Epstein, Ron. Ethical Dangers of Genetic Engineering.(http//online.sfsu.edu/ron/gedanger.htm) (February 26, 2000).Wald, George. The Case Against Genetic Engineering. New Jersey EnglewoodCliffs, 2006.